|
Our Teacher
Research: Past & Present
Helping
all students achieve higher standards
Golden Opportunity or
Gilded Blackboard?
The Value of Technology as a Tool for Literacy,
Socratic Dialogue and ELL Empowerment in the
Social Studies Classroom
by Chris Mullin, Santa
Ynez High School, Santa Barbara, CA. E-mail
Chris.
In the last twenty years,
the access to fast paced, highly visual and
pulse-quickening entertainment has grown by
leaps and bounds. While one could probably
say the same for the increase of gladiatorial
bouts, chariot races and bear baiting of Nero's
reign in the first century AD, the entertainment
that bombards us today is almost exclusively
technologically generated and communicated.
This fact, perhaps an accepted truism hardly
worth mentioning aloud, has accompanied the
growth and maturation process of every child
we see pass through our classrooms. The end
result, for better or for worse, is that the
mind of an average teenager today is simultaneously
well adapted to receiving and cataloguing rapid
visual data while at the same time lacking
in the patience and/or interest for decoding
the seemingly static print of our textbooks
and novels.
Literacy and reading comprehension
woes tug on our shirtsleeves in every subject
matter in the form of low standardized test
scores, incomplete reading assignments, plagiarized
Internet essays and seeming academic lethargy.
Rounding out this cultural malaise toward reading
is the ever-present influx of English language
learners. Children of myriad cultures find
their way into the public school system, neophytes
to the English language who still nevertheless
experience the technological barrage so easily
provided by a cheap, home cable hookup. Consequently,
most teachers are looking for ways not only
to inspire their English readers to perform
the task at hand but to find methods that make
literacy accessible to children who cannot
read or write even in the language of their
country of origin.
Compounding this dual challenge
of multi-media overload and deficiency in basic
literacy is the fact that the ability to read
and write well has become divorced from the
public mythology of a path to success. Students
see financial gain available through scores
of non-collegiate avenues. The ability to read
and write - once the sine qua non for social
and economic advancement - seems to have taken
a back seat to a strange hybrid of the traits
accompanying "gangster-rappers," samurai Wall
Street yuppies, and computer nerds. This current
intensity of technological auto-stimulation
among teenage students begs the question: Should
we find a way to use the status quo to promote
literacy and content acquisition or should
we wage a determined war against a media openly
confrontational to that soul of literacy, the
quietly read book?
As a dedicated educator,
it is hardly my purpose to recommend bowing
to the trend of replacing literacy with audio-visual
inundation. Watching a contemporary historical
motion picture can be exciting and bolster
interest in the content but it is irresponsible
to the subject matter of history to attempt
to remove reading. However, the computer and
digital technology of the previous two decades
has transformed and arguably improved major
facets of our lives and there is ample reason
to consider its use in the classroom.
Therefore, I decided to study
how the implementation of technology rich lesson
plans in the teaching of high school social
studies will positively affect:
- Increased content comprehension
at all levels from ELL to AP by creating
a context for a specific subject matter
- Meaningful classroom
dialogue related to the historical content
- The lowering of affective
filters normally associated with the high
text and lecture approach to teaching
- Comprehension of content
by making use of stimulating visual literacy
Technology in some form has
been a part of the classroom for decades. When
the technological community began to mass-produce
the overhead projector in the late 1960s, cutting
edge educators looked on gleefully at the streamlined
visual wonder and claimed it would transform
teaching. To be fair, at the time it solved
many problems such as chalk dust, turning your
back on the students and how to project large
visual images into a communal staging area.
Now we are forced to admit that the overhead
projector has done little that a good old-fashioned
slide projector and chalkboard could not do
just as well or better. It greatest fault lies
not with the modern technology but with the
archaic methodology teachers used alongside
it. Teachers used the new technology to teach
in the same old way, rather like using an unplugged
electric beater to manually stir a batter.
Similarly, I question to
what extent are today's teachers using cutting
edge technology to revisit the sins of the
past. Does using technology to take attendance
and enter grades constitute any advancement
in teaching worthy of the billions spent on
classroom internet hookups, data projectors
and legions of overloaded servers? If teachers
type notes into a multi-media software slide
and then project those images with the help
of a data projector are they really implementing
technology or merely offering a gilded chalkboard?
If we as teachers are going to try to tap into
their students' predisposition toward multimedia
in order to successfully implement the learning
strands and content standards, we must be sure
to implement activities that speak to the unique
assets of modern technology.
Teaching Tools
I used four contemporary technological tools
in my teaching and surveyed one hundred 9th - 12th
grade students ranging from ELL to Advanced Placement
about the use and their response to these tools.
The tools are:
- Multi-media software
such as PowerPoint and Hyper Studio
- Data/Video projectors
for teacher and student presentations
- Internet search engines
and email
- Computer speakers and
CD and MP3 players
Teaching Activities
Multi-Media Presentations
One of my most successful efforts has been in the forum of content laden multi-media
presentations. At the start of each new social studies unit, I like to create
a slide show of roughly 30-40 images of primary sources. I present the images
in a darkened room on the big screen with a primary source music file playing
in the background. What the students see is a 2-4 minute highly visual presentation
that immerses them in content in a non-threatening manner. Prior to the viewing,
students are asked to take out a sheet of paper and to jot down any ideas,
thoughts or connections that are stimulated during the show. I end the show
by freezing on one particularly dramatic or meaningful primary source image
and then lead the students in a summary discussion. Once we have brainstormed
on initial impressions, students view and decode several of the more powerful
primary sources from the show.
A good example of this type of activity is a recent presentation I created
on Jacksonian Democracy. In the background I played an 1832
pro-Whig campaign song while the students viewed images of humorous political
cartoons of the day. The students brainstormed reactions to the images as the
show progressed and immediately following the slides, we debriefed as a class.
In this situation, I had students call out observations and react to other
students' comments. At this point, I had the students look at five or six of
the more meaningful slides and through a series of directed questions, unravel
their meaning. Because no one had seen these primary sources before, no one
was an expert. Students who were normally reluctant to speak saw the more aggressive
students making assumptions about images and as frequently as not misinterpreting
the meaning. As the class self-corrected and clarified meaning for each slide
we were able to move onto the next one.
By using current technology,
a teacher can knock off a solid show like mines
in less than an hour, save it on a hard drive
and email it to colleagues across the school
and nation. Without the presence of current
technology the above-described activity so
rich in visual literacy and the bolstering
of decoding skills as well as content acquisition
could take place rarely, if ever.
Data/Video Projector
Over the course of the school year I have
delved into a number of other technology related
activities designed to heighten content knowledge
both among traditional college prep as well as
ELL students. I frequently presented via a digital
projector a primary source political cartoon
related to the historical topic at hand. I blocked
out the text and captions related to the image
ahead of time and asked the students to brainstorm
predictions of what the characters might be saying
or how the political cartoonist might have entitled
his/her cartoon. Once the students had voiced
their opinions and predictions, I used the mouse
to reveal the actual text. Students were then
able to compare their predictions with the actual
results.
Computer Learning Stations - Internet and
Software
Another technological method that I have
found useful is computer learning stations. I
divided
my students up into groups of four and sent them
around to different computer terminals in my classroom
with different pre-set sites on them.
For example, in one case
I used a World War I web site entitled Trenches
on the Web and had them open to areas such
as World War I propaganda, letters between
the Czar and the Kaiser, new war technology.
At each station the students had to scroll
and click around the site and answer a series
of both factual and critical thinking questions.
I have also found that one
of the best uses of contemporary technology
was to stimulate good Socratic dialogue. Most
teachers would agree that the best way to teach
the standards is to encourage students to make
their own meaning out of the content. In social
studies classroom, the traditional lecture
is the preferred methodology of the minority
of students and often incomprehensible to emerging
English learners. This year I have made it
a point to use images projected by a data projector
to stimulate the dialogue on a whole-class
level. In my AP Euro class I presented two
eighteenth century woods cuts from London.
Both woodcuts presented humorous images of
London folk drinking, one portraying the beverage
gin in a very negative light and the other
presenting beer in a positive light. Without
any lecture, and relying only on the two images
for prior knowledge I was able to guide the
students through a series of questions that
left them with a proper analysis of the intent
of the political cartoonist.
Audio Files
I use audio files as a way to lower the affective
filter, raise literacy and address the standards.
One of the greatest resources for the social studies
teacher is myriad of historical primary source
audio files. From FDR's "We have nothing to
fear but fear itself." speech to Jefferson
Airplane's White Rabbit primary source,
audio files are very accessible to the teacher
and very approachable for the English language
learner and AP student alike. Each time I introduce
and audio file, I also make sure that I use the
data projector to present the written text of the
song. Students of all levels need the reinforcement
of perceiving the text visually as well as audibly.
By presenting music or dramatic radio broadcasts,
I found myself far more likely to engage the students
than if I had simply handed out the text. English
language learners can match word sounds to written
words. Virtually all the social studies standards
have some sort of audio primary source that can
be used as a content teaching support. In the past
I have used baroque music to teach the Counter
Reformation and Mr. Sandman to teach the Eisenhower
administration.
My Findings
From my student surveys and my personal observations and experience in the
classroom, technology has had a significant impact on my students and me
as a teacher in a number of areas.
Increased comprehension
from students of all levels and the creation
of a context:
My initial focus in the implementation of
technology was to increase comprehension
of subject matter for all students from AP
to ELL. My belief was that I could
use a barrage of primary source images backed up by a primary source audio
file to create a quick context into which students could implant any new learning.
I asked two questions to
my students:
- Multi-media presentations
have helped me to establish a better feel
for the era we were studying. (strongly agree,
agree, disagree, strongly disagree)
- Has technology helped
you establish a "context" or general feeling
for the topics you were studying?
Ninety-seven percent of the
students marked either "strongly agree" or "agree" for
the first question. In the second question,
96% marked "strongly agree" or "agree". Students
had mostly positive comments to make:
"You kind of get a cool
feeling with the music. It adds a certain
touch that makes you understand the era." - College
Prep Junior
"I like watching multi-media presentations
in history because it seems to bring more
life into the topic. Sometimes in the afternoon
my attention span is small and multi media
presentations help me stay focused. There
is also more visuals that helps me recall
and capture an era better." - AP Junior
However, there were also a small number of students who were rather dubious
as the effective use of technology:
"It hasn't really helped
that much but only because I basically know
the topics we learned this year. But it does
make it much more interesting." - CP
Junior
"Not really to me. It's the teacher and
the way they explain it." - CP Junior
Based on student response, my primary theory
in this area is that if the teacher can create
a temporary historical context or flesh out
an existing context
in the mind of the student, two things will happen. First, students will be
much better able to categorize new historical information and second, students
will be more likely to discuss a newly addressed topic. I found virtually all
the students admitted in their surveys that multi-media presentations were
entertaining and well over 80% said they felt the presentation were helpful
at establishing a better context. My personal perception was that in regular
content assessment areas, students were better prepared on subjects where they
had seen a multi-media presentation.
In particular, I thought
my short technological lessons with data and
video projectors were valuable to students
ELL students. Because the documents were mostly
visual, all students, regardless of English
literacy, could take part in the analysis process,
both internally and externally through shared
comments, engage in analyzing primary source
documents, and attempt to make historical conclusions.
Second, by the time the actual text was introduced,
the students had already created a predictive
and historical frame of reference onto which
they could attach their language decoding.
ELL students seeing new words or terms for
the first time stood a far better chance of
increasing historical literacy. Third, by engaging
in prediction and the analytical viewing of
rich visuals, students were much better able
to recall historical content later on. By using
technology in this manner, I was able to expand
on the more limiting reading and lecture oriented
methodology. Students now had multiple frameworks
for all of their subject matter acquisition.
Addressing the needs of limited
English participants was particularly important
to ensure increased comprehension. Beyond video,
I discovered a number of other technological
ways to address the needs of in the teaching
process. One such method was the "living tableau." I
projected primary source photos such as that
of the Big Three at Yalta or of The McCarthy
hearings and asked students to reproduce the
characters as stick figures. I then asked students
to create think bubbles above the heads of
their stick figures filled with historically
relevant thoughts. Once the students were finished
predicting, I had a number of volunteers stand
in front of different figures in the projected
photo and read off their thought bubble. The
primary value of a technology related exercise
such as this is to encourage prediction and
historical writing while engaging the students
with highly visual content.
Meaningful Classroom Dialogue
One of the biggest challenges that I attempted
to address with technology was to find a
student voice in a regular classroom discussion.
I believe that by
using thought-provoking still images such as posters and political cartoons
projected in a large central location alongside the multi-media presentations,
more students would be likely to take part in discussion.
Students responded to my attempts with:
"I enjoy it as a change
of pace. It adds more enjoyment to the subject
matter and more diversity into the way we
as students learn." - AP Junior
"When you see something,
it is easier to relate with it. Therefore
helping the average student." - CP Junior
"I love watching them. It is interesting
to see what the historical events actually
looked like and I can understand the time
period better." - AP Junior
"You can really see the emotion or the
propaganda that the time was dealing with." -
AP Junior
Virtually all students gave positive comments
citing both a preference for visual over
written material as well as its ability to
keep them interested
and focused. My personal experience as a teacher who strongly values Socratic
discussion is that both the multi-media presentations and the still images
have led to sustained, higher order think discussion across the board. Furthermore,
my impression is that a substantially wider cross section of the students will
offer opinions and ideas. More often than not, I will find that the students
who struggle academically will have the best insights related to visual stimulation.
The lowering of affective
filters normally associated with the high
text and lecture approach to learning.
For better or worse, children today have
access to a wide variety of meaningful non-written
media. To the mind of a teenager, it seems
everything critical
to daily life can be obtained through audio/visual media or oral description.
The upshot is that the incentive to become a strong reader seems to apply almost
exclusively to those who seek out literacy for recreational and intellectual
purposes.
Though I was seeking responses
to the affect of technology, I found students
frequently expressed distaste for reading:
"Students last much longer
when watching a presentation rather than
simply reading hundreds of pages in a book." - AP
Junior
"It is very good to understand
the mood of the time. It if just comes from
a book, it doesn't really bring you into
it. The presentations make it alive." - CP
Junior
"I think it is especially helpful for
students with a low attention span and it's
certainly more exciting than book work." - Non
College Prep Junior
Students across the board, from non-college
prep to advanced placement, expressed a negative
feeling toward reading and bookwork. They
also suggested that multi-media
presentations helped them both comprehend and engage. Furthermore, many students
also said they disliked the standard lecture format:
"I love it! It's better
than listening to a teacher drone on and
on for an hour and a half." - CP Junior
"It isn't as boring as listening to a
lecture; it's more fun." - CP Sophomore
"I enjoy watching it instead of lecture
all the time." - CP Senior
"I like watching the multi-media presentations
rather than listening to an extremely boring lecture." - AP
Junior
What I gleaned from these
quotes is not a condemnation of reading and
lecture - though that voice is certainly there - but
rather a voice of approval and buy-in for subject
matters that are peppered with presentations
that speak to their backgrounds.
Comprehension of content
by making use of stimulating visual literacy
My students have made it clear that they
approve of the use of technology and seem
to favor it over more traditional methods
of teaching. A major benefit
of a well-rounded use of technology is being able to use visual literacy as
a tool for content acquisition. Visual literacy denotes a body of content understanding
through images. For example, a child who spends a great deal of his/her life
watching professional baseball games on television will develop a virtual encyclopedia
of visual information related to the game. The look of various stadiums, the
camera angles on the pitcher, the side shots of the team in the dug out and
the images loyal fans eating hot dogs and drinking beer are all images which
speak volumes related to the game. The child blends the myriad of visual images
with emotions, conversations, and even personal experience all related playing
the game into a deeply complex understanding for the content of baseball. Though
the child may never have read a single book related to baseball, he/she will
be deeply knowledgeable about the sport and adjunct experiences.
As a teacher, I can also
make use of prior-visual-literacy as well as
newly created temporary visual literacy in
order to teach a certain subject matter. For
example, for some students the projection of
the Mexican flag might conjure up a wide variety
of emotions and previous experiences. For other
students, a photo of the Normandy invasion
or the Kennedy assassination could summon up
prior knowledge. Likewise, I can make use of
a variety of never seen before images and photos
to create a brand new context upon which to
build further information. For example, I could
show a dozen or so slides of 1950s children
playing in back yard bomb shelters, radiation
fallout flyers, B-movies about the "red menace," and
McCarthy hearings in order to set the mood
for a certain unit. I could also play period
music to further establish a whole learning
experience.
Almost across the board,
students felt that the use of technology helped
them understand the actual content. Ninety-seven
percent said multi-media helped them understand
historical topics, and 96% said slide discussions
helped them understand historical topics.
"Technology has helped
a lot for a context because it creates a
feel for how a situation was reacted upon
by the people who are demonstrated." - AP
Junior
"I believe technology
has helped me with the material. I am studying
at the time because it helps paint a picture
in my head for what I am doing." - CP
Freshman
There were certainly some voices against the effective use of technology:
"Although slides and video
are useful, I think it is actually the teacher's
ability to teach that allows for an understanding
of the topic." -- AP Junior
"No, really to me it's
the teacher and how they explain it." --
CP Senior
However, a large majority of students felt that by addressing visual literacy
the teacher was able to teach to a variety of learning styles and to bolster
overall comprehension. Although the students overwhelmingly approved of the
use of technology to make the class more fun, 17% felt that the multi-media
presentations did not help them on test performance and another 17% felt that
the use of isolated still images such as political cartoons and photos did
not help them later on a test. The percentages of negative responses in this
area are way up from an average of 3% dissenting on the other survey questions.
This leads me to wonder, if the use of technology is bolstering student buy-in,
is it necessarily helping content acquisition?
Conclusions
The truth is that technology has opened an enormous door for all teachers to
teach like this all the time. Contemporary technology in the hands of a
skilled teacher is completely liberating and, in particular, lends itself
perfectly to those teachers who are struggling to find ways to address
the needs of a limited-English population.
For a social science teacher
like me, contemporary technology offers a medium
for seeking out, manipulating, presenting and
storing all manner of highly visual, audible
and stimulating primary sources. In fact, technology
creates a whole new type of historical language
and allows the history teacher to teach more
responsibly than in the past, when both students
and teachers had to rely on highly biased textbooks
for content acquisition. The constant use of
primary sources, both written and visual could
conceivably become the norm for the social
studies classroom, with the visual supporting
the written and vice versa. All students from
ELL to AP would benefit from this new, hands-on
approach to the social studies content acquisition.
By building literacy on a scaffold of approachable
historical images and other primary sources,
students are able to render text more effectively.
Since we can now see that
there is little doubt that the implementation
of contemporary technology on a large scale
can be empowering to all levels of students,
the bigger question becomes - how do teachers
the skills and preparation they need to implement
such technologically rich pedagogy as well
as the confidence to change their traditional
teaching styles? There is a strong need for
professional development is necessary to ensure
teachers can successfully integrate technology
into the classroom. Some suggestions for how
to develop these skills in teachers are:
- Investigate making technological
competency a broader part of all credential
programs.
- Create a state or national
public schools server with easily downloadable
technological lessons and multi-media presentations
based on the standards.
- Create state or district
funded professional development time where
teachers can observe masters in the use of
technology and visual literacy.
Additionally, schools must
invest more money in the purchase of contemporary
audio-visual equipment. If students and teachers
continue to rely upon old projectors and tape
recorders, then the training teachers to integrate
multi-media presentations will be useless.
We can see that through professional
development, a teacher can use technology to
address multiple learning styles as well as
imbue the class with enough entertainment value
to appeal to the audio/visual child's life
experiences. By combining technology with an
adequate understanding of the principle of
visual literacy, teachers can better meet the
students on their own ground and lower obstructions
to the learning process.
|